Even graduates from top universities like Stanford are facing unprecedented challenges in securing entry-level software engineering positions as artificial intelligence reshapes the tech job market.
The Current Job Market Crisis for CS Graduates
According to recent reporting by the Los Angeles Times, computer science graduates from elite institutions like Stanford University are experiencing significant difficulties finding entry-level positions in the tech industry. Stanford bioengineering professor Jan Liphardt expressed shock at this situation, calling it “crazy” that Stanford CS graduates are struggling to secure jobs at prominent tech companies.
The mood on Stanford’s campus has been described as “very dreary” by students grappling with this new reality. Many graduates are settling for positions at companies they might previously have considered beneath their qualifications, while others are pursuing graduate degrees or attempting to launch their own startups as alternative paths.
The AI Replacement Narrative
A prevailing sentiment in the industry suggests that for every ten programmers previously needed, companies now require only two, plus a large language model (LLM). Amr Awadallah, CEO of AI startup Vectara, boldly claimed that “AI now can code better than the average junior developer that comes out of the best schools” and that “we don’t need the junior developers anymore.”
Contradictions in the Data
Despite the gloomy job market for new graduates, research reveals some contradictions in the AI replacement narrative:
- A study found that software developers using AI tools actually became 19% slower, contrary to predictions from economics experts, machine learning specialists, and developers themselves.
- Research from investment company Vanguard discovered that the top 100 occupations most vulnerable to AI automation are actually outperforming the rest of the labor market in both wage and job growth.
These findings suggest that AI systems may be enhancing worker productivity and shifting tasks toward higher-value activities rather than simply replacing workers.
The Real Issue: Economic Systems, Not AI
The article suggests that the problem isn’t AI technology itself but rather the economic system governing its implementation. Technology analyst Morten Rand-Hendriksen explains that “AI can’t replace people, but it can create short-term financial gain at the cost of long-term skill- and knowledge loss.”
Rand-Hendriksen further warns that AI should serve as a tool to extend human capabilities, but this requires leadership and an economic environment that values human work over increasing shareholder profits. He describes AI as “an exponentially replicating canary in the coalmine of capitalism,” urging action to preserve space for human workers.
Looking Forward
The disconnect between AI’s potential to enhance productivity and the current job market difficulties for new graduates highlights a crucial challenge for the tech industry and society at large. As Google’s CEO has reportedly suggested, society may need to endure significant disruption as AI transforms the workforce, raising important questions about how we manage this transition.

GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings