Thomas Unise
A recent case of parents using ChatGPT to name their newborn son has ignited controversy and raised questions about our increasing reliance on AI for deeply personal decisions.
The AI-Generated Baby Name
As reported by the Baltimore Sun, Sarah and Stephen Winkler turned to OpenAI’s ChatGPT to help name their firstborn son. The couple asked the AI for boy names that would pair well with their last name, ultimately settling on “Hudson Oakley Winkler” – a choice that many critics described as bland and lacking personal significance.
Public Reaction
The decision sparked immediate backlash online, with critics arguing that outsourcing such an intimate parental responsibility to AI represents a troubling trend. Author and NPR podcast host Linda Holmes expressed concern about people “losing either the confidence or the willingness to complete basic human tasks.” Others emphasized that the collaborative process of naming a child with one’s partner is a meaningful experience that shouldn’t be delegated to technology.
The Broader Trend
This incident highlights the growing integration of AI tools like ChatGPT into increasingly personal aspects of life. According to OpenAI’s own research, approximately 70 percent of ChatGPT consumer queries as of July were “unrelated to work,” suggesting these tools are rapidly becoming everyday life assistants.
Beyond baby names, people have used AI to write deeply personal content like obituaries and dating messages – tasks traditionally considered uniquely human.
Concerns About AI Dependency
Experts warn about the potential consequences of over-reliance on AI for personal matters. AI ethicist James Wilson noted that large language models are “specifically built to be conversational masters,” making it “all too easy” to form unhealthy relationships with them.
In extreme cases, emotional attachment to AI chatbots has been linked to serious consequences, including teen suicides that have led to lawsuits against AI companies.
The Pushback
The controversy has fueled a growing countermovement against excessive AI use in personal decision-making. Critics argue that delegating intimate human experiences to AI diminishes something essential about being human, with one commenter lamenting that “offloading something as sentimental as naming your child to a glorified chatbot is representative of the era of rewarmed s*** we live in.”
Key Takeaway
While AI tools continue to advance and integrate into daily life, this incident highlights the ongoing tension between technological convenience and preserving meaningful human experiences. The debate raises important questions about where we should draw boundaries around AI’s role in our most personal decisions.
GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings